A conclusion restates your goals and methods, includes any final data and notes whether you were able to successfully answer the questions posed by your experiment. If you began your report with an introductory paragraph, briefly restate what you said there. Note all objectives of your experiment: What question or questions were you seeking to answer?
Novice Introduction Presents a clear summary of the aims of the study and its significance. Briefly describes experimental design. Probably includes one or more references to supporting sources.
Either lacks clarity or is missing one of the primary elements. Weak or missing primary elements. Materials and Methods Gives the reader a clear picture of the methods and materials used. Does not use prescriptive language. Uses specific, not general, terminology.
Detailed, step-by-step procedures are clearly referenced. Avoids long, redundant descriptions. May be some written as a protocol rather than a description. Some methods are omitted; others are presented in a piecemeal, vague form.
Results All figures and tables have titles and legends. All results are clearly presented, with a logical sequence.
Controls are clearly indicated. Some data may be missing, or legends may be brief, vague or uninformative. Data is presented haphazardly.
It is sometimes not possible to tell what material or procedure was used to obtain the data. No logical connection between methods and data. Irrelevant data may be included, and relevant data left out.
Discussion It is clear that the methods and results have been understood. The results including controls are related to the questions posed and analyzed for their effectiveness.
There may be some lack of clarity. Did the writer understand why certain methods were used, and how the results could shed light on the questions asked?
Incomplete analysis of inconsistencies and unexpected results. Very little analysis of the results. Statements are vague and general.
Mostly a restatement of results. No recognition of error sources. No understanding of controls. Cohesiveness It is clear that the report covers a group of related procedures with a clear set of goals.
Sometimes the goals are not clearly related to the report. Some fragmentation occurs, with methods and results apparently unrelated to each other. Aims are not clearly present throughout. Very little use of headings, or explanatory sentences. Apparently not proofread for errors.Below is a very interesting read from the FBI Training Division, FBI Academy, Quantico, VA.
from a few months ago. This was a PDF file that was sent to me by a coworker. I want to emphasis this is not mine and I did not create it/the content. I simply copied the text and placed Read moreFBI 9MM Justification, FBI Training Division.
Results Highlights. In this Results section we provide Highlights of the comprehensive DisplayMate Lab tests and measurements and extensive visual comparisons using test photos, test images, and test patterns that are covered in the advanced sections.
People write this kind of conclusion when they can’t think of anything else to say. Example: In conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for . Automatic works cited and bibliography formatting for MLA, APA and Chicago/Turabian citation styles.
Now supports 7th edition of MLA. The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.
This assignment must be completed prior to attending this lab! Before attending this lab you must: 1. View the following YouTube videos.
2. Complete the Lab 15 .