Persuasive essay on female genital mutilation

World Population Awareness Why Population Matters Having one fewer child is the most effective way an individual would have to fight climate change.

Persuasive essay on female genital mutilation

Yet the reasons for such discouragement are clear. Circumcision of boys may be performed only by physicians when there are medical benefits attributed. That is the premise of the KNMG, the organization of and for physicians. Destructiveness The International Convention on the Rights of the Child ICRC says that the government is required to ensure that harmful traditional practices be abolished.

Persuasive essay on female genital mutilation

The science is undeniable that circumcision is harmful. A circumcision means 25 to 50 Persuasive essay on female genital mutilation of the healthy tissue of the penis is removed.

Immediately after the operation, an infection or bleeding occurs in two to five percent of the boys, which sometimes requires hospitalization. Many boys up to twenty percent later get a stricture of the urethra, causing problems with urination and possibly bladder problems.

Still later circumcised men and their partners get sexual problems more often than non-circumcised men, because a circumcised penis is less sensitive.

Also, many men complain about the fact that they were circumcised without their consent.

Support your TRF

Any medical benefits - such as a possible reduced risk of HIV transmission [in unprotected heterosexual intercourse] - are relevant at a later age and are no justification for circumcision in childhood. It is noteworthy that in the Netherlands all forms of female circumcision are forbidden - even in symbolic form, with no tissue being removed - but that circumcision of boys is tolerated.

Why is it that Jewish and Muslim boys are not equally protected by law as girls?

Persuasive essay on female genital mutilation

Religious freedom or physical integrity? The debate about circumcision of boys is often presented as a conflict between the right of the child to physical integrity and the right of parents to religious freedom. This freedom implies that it is permissible for a child to be educated in religion, but also that the child should keep the freedom to choose a different opinion later.

This means that the child should remain protected from irreversible physical alterations. This legal ruling fits into a debate about circumcision of boys being conducted in almost the entire Western world, even within religious groups. In Israel, a growing group of parents refrain from circumcising.

Social pressure Many parents who still perform circumcision do so because of social pressure from their parents and grandparents, not from religious feelings.

In America, a growing number of Jewish parents, together with religious leaders, have developed alternative rituals in which the child can be included in the religious community, but without violating the integrity of the child's body. Growing resistance The growing resistance to circumcision of boys comes not only from the medical profession and secular society, but also from religious communities themselves.

The debate has nothing to do with anti-semitism or anti-religion, as is sometimes suggested. It is a manifestation of a growing awareness that children have the same fundamental rights as adults. If it is not permissible for a man to be circumcised against his will, why is it permissible to do the same to a child?

Personal choice Circumcision is a personal choice for which people have different reasons. Fortunately we live in a country where people are free to make that choice.

But let it be a choice that the person makes for himself, because ultimately there is only one person who should decide whether or not to remove a healthy part of the body, and that is the man himself.

The complainant considered that [such] interference [by] the Slovenian doctors is harmful but he does not know all the negative consequences [of prejudice] subconscious trauma, impotence, infection, etc.

Expanded expert committee for surgery Indications for professional intervention are listed in the professional urological literature. The Office of the Commission for Medical Ethics has sent us a long answer, which we summarize in its opinion of principle: The Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia [w]as asked for information concerning payment [for] circumcision annual number of interventions, the price of services and how the issue of payment is arranged, if medical intervention is not indicated, but is carried out only at the request of the individual or his legal representatives.

When intervention is not medically indicated, service is not covered by the compulsory health insurance, so [it is for] the patient or his agents to pay [for] the intervention. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child obliges States Parties to take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury and abuse, while in the care of parents, legal guardians or any other person who care for him article 19 CRC.

The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia in the 56th Article [grants the] child special protection and care [under] the 35[th] Article as everyone is guaranteed the inviolability of physical and mental integrity. These provisions clearly show that any intervention in the physical integrity of children is limited and justifiable only for medical reasons.

If there is a medical indication, that is, to protect the health of the child, circumcision [may] be [performed]; such intervention is a legitimate and legal, and [the] permission [of] a parent [who] has responsibility for the child's development [is] required or allowed. If for any reason parents would not [allow an] indicated medical intervention, the competent authorities [may] determine possible dereliction of duty [in] caring for the child and take the necessary measures provided by law.

However, if has medical circumcision the child is [not] indicated, but is only [a] result of his parents' beliefs religious or otherwisesuch intervention is no legal basis.and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever.: Praise ye the LORD.

- Female Genital Mutilation in Africa ital Mutilation in Sudan In the country of Sudan, in Northern Africa, there is a procedure that is tradition and is performed on most women called female genital mutilation, or FGM, which used to be known as female circumcision. Oct 07,  · Female genital mutilation is a terrible injustice that happens to innocent women everyday.

Female genital mutilation is the cutting, or partial or total removal, of the external female genitalia for cultural, religious, or other non-medical reasons.

I. If you are American, SSC endorses voting in this presidential election. Andrew Gelman, Nate Silver, and Aaron Edlin calculate the chance that a single vote will determine the election (ie break a tie in a state that breaks an Electoral College tie).

It ranges from about one in ten million (if you live in a swing state) to one in a billion (if you live in a very safe state). ENERGY ENHANCEMENT IS THE SOLUTION!!

Alex Jones looks through the Eye of Sauron, the father of lies, - news from the great lying satanic media empires - and . Essay on Female Genital Mutilation Two million girls are subjected to female genital mutilation in the name of tradition every year (Win News). That is a large amount of females that undergo this procedure.

Medical Ethics, Human Rights and Law |